|
BRZ™ FOR SWIMMING POOL FILTER MEDIA
-
Size: 14 x 40
mesh
-
Color: Pale
green when dry, dark green when wet
-
Particle size:
Average 0.7 mm
-
Uniformity index:
1.9
-
NSF: ANSI/NSF
Standard 50
-
Weight: Density
55 pounds per cubic foot (880kgs/cubic
meter)
-
Surface Area:
24.9 square meters per gram
-
GRAS:
Classified as “GRAS” (generally regarded as
safe) under CFR 21 Part 182.279, 40 CFR Part
180.1001
-
Hardness: Low
clay, hard, abrasion resistant
-
Availability:
Sold as “Zeo Sand ® Natural Zeolite Filter
Media” by Zeo Inc.
zeosand@zeoinc.com,
www.zeoinc.com 800-530-8283 or 972-542-0053
|
THEORY OF ZEOLITE FILTER MEDIA |
The advantages of using BRZ™ in physical
filtration systems include the following:
-
The high internal and external surface area
of BRZ™ (@25m2/g) exceeds that of
quartz by more than 10 times.
-
BRZ™ pore space permeability for water
transmission through the grains or fragments
is 100% compared to non-permeable quartz
grains.
-
BRZ™ will tend to make slightly acidic (e.g.
pH - 5.5-6.0) water more near neutral.
-
The amount, or layer thickness of BRZ™ in
the filtration systems can be much thinner
(smaller volume) than quartz sand systems -
because of the high “surface area and pore
space” of BRZ™.
-
BRZ™ fragments tend to be discoid shaped,
rather than round, thus presenting a large
surface area (per unit of mass) (see diagram
below).
-
The density of 2-4 mm granules of BRZ™ is
about 55-60 lb/ft3, which is
about half of that of quartz grains of
similar size. Thus the volume of one ton of
BRZ™ is twice that of quartz sand.
|
WATER PATHS FOR
QUARTZ VERSUS ZEOLITE IN FILTRATION |

-
A 25 pound bag of BRZ™ has the surface area
of over 50 NFL football fields, while a 50
pound bag of sand only covers football
field.
-
Increased flow rate
-
DE like clarity. Nominal 3 to 5 micron
rating
-
Reduces backwash time by up to 50%
-
Higher loading capacity than sand
-
Less eye burning. BRZ™ exchanges ammonium
from urine directly into the crystal lattice
where it is not water soluble. As a result,
less chlorine is use and fewer chloramines
are formed (that burn the eyes).
-
Less chlorine is needed
-
Life expectancy is the same as sand
-
Used BRZ™ can be applied as a soil amendment
for gardens and potted plants
|
COMPARISON OF ZEOLITE
FILTER PERFORMANCE VS CONVENTIONAL
MEDIA:
Pressure Vessels |
|
FILTER
MEDIA |
BED
COMPOSITION |
FILTRATION
RATING (nominal) |
SOLIDS LOADING
CAPACITY |
|
Sand
(6-12 gpm/ft2) |
20 x 40 mesh |
~20µ |
1X |
|
Sand/Anthracite
(6-12 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%)
20 x 40 mesh sand
(34%) |
~15µ |
1.4X |
|
Multimedia
(10-12 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%)
20 x 40 mesh sand
(30%)
# 50 garnet (15%)
# 16 garnet (10%) |
~12µ |
1.6X |
|
Zeolite*
(10-20 gpm/ft2) |
14 x 40 mesh (100%) |
~5µ |
2.8X |
|
COMPARISON OF ZEOLITE
FILTER PERFORMANCE VS CONVENTIONAL
MEDIA: Gravity Flow Beds |
|
FILTER
MEDIA |
BED
COMPOSITION |
FILTRATION
RATING (nominal) |
SOLIDS LOADING
CAPACITY |
|
Sand
(2 gpm/ft2) |
20 x 40 mesh |
~20µ |
1X |
|
Sand/Anthracite
(2 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%)
20 x 40 mesh sand
(34%) |
~15µ |
1.4X |
|
Zeolite*
(4 gpm/ft2
design) |
14 x 40 mesh
|
~5µ |
2.6 - 2.8X |
|