|
|
THEORY OF ZEOLITE
FILTER MEDIA |
Using BRZ™
natural zeolite in physical filtration systems provides the following
advantages:
-
The high internal and
external surface area of
BRZ™
(@25m2/g) exceeds that of quartz by
more than 10 times.
-
BRZ™
pore space permeability for water transmission through the grains or
fragments is 100% compared to non-permeable quartz grains.
-
BRZ™
will tend to make slightly acidic (e.g. pH - 5.5-6.0) water more near
neutral.
-
The amount, or layer
thickness of BRZ in the filtration systems can be much thinner (smaller
volume) than quartz sand systems - because of the high “surface area and
pore space” of
BRZ™.
-
BRZ™
fragments tend to be discoid shaped, rather than round, thus presenting a
large surface area (per unit of mass) (see diagram below).
-
The density of 2-4 mm
granules of
BRZ™
is about 55-60 lb/ft3, which is about half of that of quartz
grains of similar size. Thus the volume of one ton of
BRZ™
is twice that of quartz sand.
WATER PATHS FOR QUARTZ VERSUS
ZEOLITE IN FILTRATION
-
Mineral:
Consists of a volcanic
mineral called "clinoptilolite" (see spec sheet)
-
Size:
14 x 40 mesh
-
Color:
Pale green when dry, dark
green when wet
-
Particle
size: Average 0.7
mm
-
Uniformity
index: 1.9
-
NSF:
ANSI/NSF Standard 50
-
Weight:
Density 55 pounds per cubic
foot (880kgs/cubic meter)
-
Surface
Area: 24.9 square
meters per gram
-
GRAS:
Classified as “GRAS” (generally regarded as safe) under CFR Part 182.279, 40 CFR Part 180.1001
-
Hardness:
Low clay, hard, abrasion resistant
-
Availability:
Sold as “Zeo Sand ® Natural Zeolite Filter Media” by Zeo Inc.
zeosand@zeoinc.com,
www.zeoinc.com 800-530-8283 or 972-542-0053

-
A 25 pound
bag of BRZ™
has the surface area of over 50 NFL football fields, while a 50
pound bag of sand only covers 1 football field.
-
Increased
flow rate
-
DE like
clarity. Nominal 3 to 5 micron rating
-
Reduces
backwash time by up to 50%
-
Higher
loading capacity than sand
-
Less eye
burning. BRZ™ exchanges ammonium from urine directly into the crystal lattice
where it is not water soluble. As a result, less chlorine is use and fewer
chloramines are formed (that burn the eyes).
-
Less
chlorine is needed
-
Life
expectancy is the same as sand
-
Used BRZ™
can be applied as a soil amendment for gardens and potted plants
COMPARISON OF ZEOLITE FILTERS
PERFORMANCE VS CONVENTIONAL MEDIA:
Pressure Vessels
|
FILTER MEDIA |
BED COMPOSITION |
FILTRATION RATING (nominal) |
SOLIDS LOADING CAPACITY |
|
Sand (6-12 gpm/ft2) |
20 x 40 mesh |
~20µ |
1X |
|
Sand/Anthracite
(6-12 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%) 20 x 40
mesh sand (34%) |
~15µ |
1.4X |
|
Multimedia
(10-12 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%) 20 x 40
mesh sand (30%)
# 50 garnet (15%)
#16 garnet (10%) |
~12µ |
1.6X |
|
Zeolite*
(10-12 gpm/ft2)
|
14 x 40 mesh
(100%) |
~5µ |
2.8X |
COMPARISON OF ZEOLITE FILTER PERFORMANCE VS CONVENTINAL MEDIA:
Gravity
Flow Beds
|
FILTER MEDIA |
BED COMPOSITION |
FILTRATION RATING (nominal) |
SOLIDS LOADING CAPACITY |
|
Sand (2 gpm/ft2) |
20 x 40 mesh |
~20µ |
1X |
|
Sand/Anthracite
(2 gpm/ft2) |
#1 anthracite (66%) 20 x 40
mesh sand (34%) |
~15µ |
1.4X |
|
Zeolite*
(4 gpm/ft2
design)
|
14 x 40 mesh
|
~5µ |
2.6 - 2.8X |
|